Does this breeder sound reputable?

[tanza]

My pups are right around 1000.00, I consider much over 1000.00 over the top for a puppy…. and there are many responsible breeders particularly in the Mid West that place pups for around 850.00

[YodelDogs]

@DebraDownSouth:

I doubt many responsible breeders can begin to place a pup for much under $2,000. Certainly not under $1,000.

I'm not trying to argue with you, Debra. I just want to clarify a few things about this topic.

In the US, virtually all responsible breeders place their puppies for $700-1,000and that range includes show prospects.

And if this person is considering a dog in that price range, then rescue is the answer… not a byb or puppymill dog.

FWIW, I did Basenji rescue for a decade and I know for a fact that at least 95% of all rescued Basenjis were produced by BYBs and puppy mills. The initial adoption fee for a rescue may be a little bit less than a responsibly bred dog but the risk for health issues may prove higher, and far more expensive, in the long run.

[dcmclcm4]

The price of $1000-$1500 is usually what a petstore B is priced when it first arrives at 8 weeks at least the ones I have seen at PetLand. The price goes down as it gets older. One can finance a pup like a piece of furniture.

Jennifer

[DebraDownSouth]

I haven't bought a basenji in 8 years, but back then Robyn even YOU quoted me something like $1500. Glad to hear prices lower, but again if the person looking at a $300 dog, $700 to $1000 a big jump for most.

As for health … considering my utterly champion pedigree for 5 generation dog who had major health issues, autoimmune and died with lymphoma... nothing is a guarantee. I am a bit surprised to hear breeders almost discouraging rescue. Do I believe that a puppy from a breeder with generations of genetic testing has better chance for not having those genetic problems... sure. But over-all health... not really. Research doesn't support it nor does my personal experiences.

I have heard rescuers say that breeders bash rescues... I honestly have to say while I have heard it out the yingyang with both Chow and Rottie breeders, this is my first experience with it among Basenji. It makes me very sad. With that, am out of this topic and thread.

[sharronhurlbut]

Oh, Debra, don't leave. Some areas of the country don't have a good network with rescue. I am lucky, and in the PNW, the breeders are wonderful…
They support rescue, which makes my joy so much easier.

[debbi j.]

FWIW, I did Basenji rescue for a decade and I know for a fact that at least 95% of all rescued Basenjis were produced by BYBs and puppy mills. The initial adoption fee for a rescue may be a little bit less than a responsibly bred dog but the risk for health issues may prove higher, and far more expensive, in the long run.

Hi, Robyn,

Maybe things were different when you were doing rescue. You might be surprised to know how many rescues we get who were bred by "reputable breeders" and whose breeders, once contacted by rescue, would not take back their dogs even though a contract existed between the individual buyer and the breeder. We are dealing with several of these instances right now.

[sharronhurlbut]

Debbi J, I do have to take exception about your info. 95% in my area were not by byb.
Sometimes we knew who bred the dog, and were able to get the breeders to "step" up.

[debbi j.]

Sharon, I was quoting Robyn.

[sharronhurlbut]

Sorry, I knew that, just typed the wrong name..should have been Robyn.

Robyn, I do have to say Debbi J is right, as far as my knowlege goes.
Jennifer Hill, who is part of this group, can tell you just how many puppymill b are posted.
She is the angel who deals with this.

[lvoss]

I know that when I was actively doing rescue the majority of rescues came from either BYBs (breeders not actively involved in the basenji community) or puppy mills. A few came from breeders known in the basenji community and only a handful of those outright refused to take responsibility. I don't know what the percentages were because I never calculated them.

I don't think that Robyn meant to imply that there are not well known breeders who are not taking responsibility but that in her experience those are not where most of the dogs are coming from. At this point in time, most of the rescues I am seeing are coming from internet sales by BYBs.

[nomrbddgs]

<< if the person looking at a $300 dog, $700 to $1000 a big jump for most. >>

If a person can't afford $300, then they shouldn't be getting any dog IMO. Just a vet check right after that is at least 40-50 bucks. Wasn't someone just talking about this earlier in this post? You don't want to put more money into the dog, but you're going to get another one? Doesn't this happen a lot to the people that put dogs in rescue? They conveniently get rid of a dog because of vet costs or lifestyle changes then turn around within (usually) a year and get another dog?

<_>

I have heard this bashing from rescuers as well. Most rescuers who don't have experience with reputable breeders do this as well. The facts are the facts-there are bad people on both sides of this particular coin, just as there are good people.

When did this conversation turn into 'rescuers vs breeders' ?? Aren't we supposed to be about the same thing? Getting dogs into the right homes??_

[renaultf1]

@nomrbddgs:

<< if the person looking at a $300 dog, $700 to $1000 a big jump for most. >>

If a person can't afford $300, then they shouldn't be getting any dog IMO. Just a vet check right after that is at least 40-50 bucks. Wasn't someone just talking about this earlier in this post? You don't want to put more money into the dog, but you're going to get another one? Doesn't this happen a lot to the people that put dogs in rescue? They conveniently get rid of a dog because of vet costs or lifestyle changes then turn around within (usually) a year and get another dog?

I 100% agree with this. The initial purchase price (whether it is $300 or $1000) is only a fraction of what it costs to own a dog. And yes, in this thread and in other threads, we've seen people re-home a dog (that sounds like training might be able to fix) that "can't afford" a behaviorist, only to turn around and buy another dog - or plan on buying another dog within a year. They don't listen to the advice that their home situation (lack of structure or training - animal & human) might be the cause of the behavior problems and expect immediate fixes. Their view is the dog is a failure, not that they were a major contributing factor to its failure.

Personally I've come to dread the new puppy threads each winter because many of them have purchased, without listening to the advice given, and you know that a good portion of the pups shown off will be re-homed.

I don't think anyone here is against rescue. At the same time, I don't think rescue should be against anyone going to a responsible breeder. It is an individual choice. I made the choice to initially get 2 retired show dogs - they needed a good home. And I didn't make the wrong choice - for me or for my dogs.

[YodelDogs]

@DebraDownSouth:

I haven't bought a basenji in 8 years, but back then Robyn even YOU quoted me something like $1500.

I'm sorry but you are mistaken. I have never asked more than $800 for a puppy and that includes show prospects. But, considering the puppy mill located just a few hours away charges $1200-1500, I may have to raise my price just to keep up.

[YodelDogs]

@debbi:

Hi, Robyn,

Maybe things were different when you were doing rescue.

It was easier to trace the origins of each rescue back then. I did quite a bit of detective work and kept accurate records of my findings. The majority of Basenjis that came into local rescue were from two puppy mills or a cluster of BYBs who bred their dogs back and forth. My estimate of 95% coming from BYBs or puppy mills was actually generous considering only 1 out of 50+ rescues I rehomed came from a responsible breeder.

Debbi, correct me if I am wrong but doesn't BRAT rehome approximately 500 Basenjis each year?

[DebraDownSouth]

@renaultf1:

I 100% agree with this. The initial purchase price (whether it is $300 or $1000) is only a fraction of what it costs to own a dog. …
I don't think anyone here is against rescue. At the same time, I don't think rescue should be against anyone going to a responsible breeder.

Sorry, again an additional 700 to BUY the dog on top of the care IS a lot for most people. Period.

Nor did anyone bash breeders or getting from breeders. It was breeders bashing rescue dogs or inferring (or out and out claiming) not healthy or risky temperament. From breeders who if they know ANYTHING know that temperament testing is as valid on a rescue as their own pups (well unless they suck at temperament testing)…and is VERY reliable on older pups and adults. Now I am done on this topic. I left here crying yesterday because I couldn't believe people I thought were knowledgeable and cared about the breed were pushing breeder dogs and putting down rescues. So I have my big girl panties on and my rose colored glasses removed. 'nuff said.

[khanis]

Arlene,
I have to respectfully disagree. Not everyone can fork out $1000 for a dog. Does that mean they can't take good care of the animal and pay for an emergency vet bill? No.
Heck, I don't have $1000 laying around in the event my engine blew… part of the life of a FT student and single mother.

I place my pups for $950. I have worked with MANY folks on payment plans, and reduced prices for the right home. I placed a lovely boy [that I bred] that is nearly 3 years of age and neutered… for $100 last week. He is in a fabulous home and gets to be a service dog! Sure, he lives in DT Portland, so no fenced yard, but he will live the life of Riley and have more attention than he could here in a group of 6 dogs. And I know for a fact this gal would NOT have had $1000 for a dog. Period.

Debra,
I do not, nor will I ever push rescue on folks. I tell them their options. For some folks, it is the best option. For others, it just will NOT work.
I have kids, so I know that is imperative to many families getting a pup... my pups are kid-proofed more than any puppy could possibly be that does NOT have children living under the roof. If they hit 8 wks in my house.. they are literally bomb-proof to all noises and kinds of people. You don't generally find that in rescue.

[debbi j.]

@YodelDogs:

It was easier to trace the origins of each rescue back then. I did quite a bit of detective work and kept accurate records of my findings. The majority of Basenjis that came into local rescue were from two puppy mills or a cluster of BYBs who bred their dogs back and forth. My estimate of 95% coming from BYBs or puppy mills was actually generous considering only 1 out of 50+ rescues I rehomed came from a responsible breeder.

Debbi, correct me if I am wrong but doesn't BRAT rehome approximately 500 Basenjis each year?

It's closer to 350 basenjis a year that BRAT places. We average 500 or more rescue forms a year from people wanting to rehome their dogs. We are usually able to help approximately 100 - 150 families keep their b's through help and education.

BTW, there are good breeders who do take back their dogs. We really appreciate it.

Debbi

[YodelDogs]

@debbi:

It's closer to 350 basenjis a year that BRAT places.

Thank you, Debbi. I think I was adding in rescues rehomed by other organizations and private rescuers to come up with the 500 number that was stuck in my head.

[DebraDownSouth]

@khanis:

Debra,
I do not, nor will I ever push rescue on folks. I tell them their options. For some folks, it is the best option. For others, it just will NOT work.
I have kids, so I know that is imperative to many families getting a pup… my pups are kid-proofed more than any puppy could possibly be that does NOT have children living under the roof. If they hit 8 wks in my house.. they are literally bomb-proof to all noises and kinds of people. You don't generally find that in rescue.

I don't mean push down throats, but I push them to consider. For the rest, sorry I am shaking my head. Any decent rescue foster home works to bomb proof too. And they evaluate the dogs. And you know what, most of those have only a few dogs in their house so they can closely evaluate and spend time… unlike breeders with 10, 20 or 30 dogs. And they place depending on the dog and the family. And if you really believe people with children should only get puppies, I am sorry that you are impressively misinformed. There is a difference between WANT a puppy and it be imperative for any other reason. There are situations where a puppy IS important. But it isn't for temperament or behavior.

In fact I suggest strongly that a family with children who is capable of training a puppy doesn't NEED a puppy but can do it. A family that thinks it NEEDS a puppy BECAUSE they have children probably haven't the ability to TRAIN IT OR THEIR KIDS and don't need one. Hmmm.. just a thought.

And someone who can only bond with a pup doesn't need a dog at all.

That said, I applaud your placements of dogs over money. That is what good breeders do. But it sounds like you think bomb-proofing requires kids under the roof... so I guess you think people with children should ONLY get pups from someone like you. OOOPS Robyn et al... you are now relegated to those awful rescues that also are not as good as those with children.

The truth is, exposing a puppy to many many many situations, whether kids live IN your home or not, prepares and bomb-proofs. And you know that... or should. And the next truth is that no matter what YOU do, you place a puppy in an idiot's home where a child hurts the dog, your bombproofing for kids goes down the drain. You place a pup who has limited or even NO experience with children ... but otherwise "bomb proofed"... into a home with parents who supervise and get correct behavior from their kids, the pup is going to be perfectly fine.

I deal weekly with people who got pups from reputable breeders who have issues. Some, maybe most, because the breeder placed dogs in homes that were not appropriate or didn't recognize the temperament of the puppy.

The Arabs have a saying... trust in G-d but tie your camel. Yeah, if you want a puppy whether it is from a rescue or breeder, do your homework. Being a breeder with champions out the ears doesn't make your pups great pets or great pets in the wrong home. And I haven't had a rescue I have adopted over the years... except my chow/coyote mix... that I wouldn't put their health AND temperament up against the best bred dogs of their breed. And that was the ONLY point I ever meant to make. Stop bashing rescues for health or temperament.

[dcmclcm4]

The rescues I have had through my own independent rescue from 2001 to the present have more health issues than the ones from B.E.A.R.-Basenji Education and Rescue in OH from 1992 to approx. 2000. I rescue mostly commercial breeder dogs or their offspring but some came from BYBs. I think the problem is the inbreeding. Reputable breeders are smarter now about who not to sell their pups to so there is a limited number of breeding dogs these other breeders can obtain. I used to see Chs in some of the early rescue dogs pedigrees, now I rarely see any even in the 5th generation.

I recommend getting eye exams and thyroid testing done on rescue Bs as these are the problems my rescues have. Fanconi has not been a major problem but I have not rescued an entire litter with Fanconi which is possible since these breeders do not test. I have only rescued three Bs with Fanconi since 1992, two were affected and a young one that has tested probably affected.

Jennifer