California AB1635


  • If you don't think this can happen in your state, and note the "new" clause revision that now says breeders can get an exemption (still no price noted on that cost) and breed ONE litter from the male and ONE litter from the bitch and then they must be spay/neutered… not to mention the other things now added to this bill.... THIS IS NOT A GOOD THING, nor will it fix the over population or shelter "throw away" problem....

    This now is what I believe was really wanted by PETA... limit the in-tact dogs to one per household and limit to one litter either sired by or whelped by.... in a house....

    AB 1634 has been amended again. Please read this carefully, for if this bill passes, it will mean the end of dogs in this state. A breeding permit is now available for an unspecified price for one single lifetime litter for male and female dogs but once that litter is born, both parents must be sterilized. Puppies born from this litter cannot be sold and must be given away without charge. If this does not sound like the future you envision with your dogs, please help to fight this bill by sending letters to your state Senator and the Governor and attending the rally in Sacramento on July 9. We're fighting for our lives here...

    Marianne

    BILL NUMBER: AB 1634 AMENDED
    BILL TEXT

    AMENDED IN SENATE JUNE 27, 2007
    AMENDED IN ASSEMBLY MAY 31, 2007
    AMENDED IN ASSEMBLY MAY 9, 2007
    AMENDED IN ASSEMBLY APRIL 30, 2007
    AMENDED IN ASSEMBLY APRIL 17, 2007
    AMENDED IN ASSEMBLY APRIL 9, 2007

    INTRODUCED BY Assembly Member Levine
    (Principal coauthor: Senator Padilla)
    (Coauthors: Assembly Members Nava and Solorio)

    FEBRUARY 23, 2007

    An act to add Chapter 9 (commencing with Section 122336) to Part 6
    of Division 105 of , and to repeal Section 122336.21 the
    Health and Safety Code, relating to pets.

    LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL'S DIGEST

    AB 1634, as amended, Levine. California Healthy Pets Act.
    Exis ting law sets forth provisions relating to veterinary public
    health and safety and provides for or regulates spay, neuter, and
    breeding programs for animals.
    This bill would prohibit any person from owning or possessing any
    cat or dog over the age of 4 6 months
    that has not been spayed or neutered, unless that person possesses an
    intact permit, as defined. The bill would establish an intact permit
    fee in an amount to be determined by a local jurisdiction, and would
    require the revenue from these fees to be used for the
    administration of the local jurisdiction's permit program. The bill
    would make a violation of these provisions , as
    specified, punishable by a prescribed civil penalty. It would
    require all revenues derived from these civil penalties to be used
    for funding the outreach efforts in connection with, and the
    administration and enforcement of, these provisions, and, to the
    ex tent funding is available, free and low-cost spay and neuter
    programs, and outreach efforts for those programs, which would be
    required to be established by each local animal control agency.
    By increasing the enforcement responsibility of local agencies,
    this bill would create a state-mandated local program.
    This bill would, until January 1, 2012, authorize a local
    jurisdiction or its authorized local animal control agency to allow
    for issuance of an intact permit for one male and one female dog per
    household in order to allow the dogs to produce a single litter of
    offspring, subject to specified criteria. It would authorize the
    imposition of an intact permit fee for these purposes in an amount
    determined by the local jurisdiction, to be used for funding the
    administration of the local jurisdiction's permit program.
    The bill would become operative on April 1, 2008.
    T he Cal ifornia Constitution requires the state to reimburse local
    agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the
    state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that
    reimbursement.
    This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this
    act for a specified reason.
    Vote: majority. Appropriation: no. Fiscal committee: yes.
    State-mandated local program: yes.


  • By the way, if you read this bill, it also says that you can NOT sell your puppies from that "one" breeding, you have to give them away among other requirements….

    Please folks I urge you regardless if you are in California or not, write a letter against this bill, what happens in California is the "poster child" for the rest of the country...

Suggested Topics

  • CALIFORNIA–Medical Exemption Bill AB 2000 ACTION ALERT!

    Basenji Talk
    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    673 Views
    No one has replied
  • A day at the beach in California

    Basenji Talk
    12
    0 Votes
    12 Posts
    4k Views
    VanessaV
    imbj, Yup..that was the beach we went to. You've been there too…man what a pain! I swear. We actually were at Pillar Point first to get lunch and then decided to take our B's to that beach...Yah...never again!
  • California Bill AB1634 (sigh)

    Basenji Talk
    14
    0 Votes
    14 Posts
    3k Views
    tanzaT
    This was part of the article in the Sac Bee quoting the author for this bill. HUH???? if his point was to stop over population of dogs, how can he say this? And he doesn't own dogs or cats… "In its current form, AB 1634 would leave it up to cities and counties to decide whether to issue permits allowing reproduction of mixed-breed dogs, often called mutts. During Wednesday's floor debate, however, Levine said he was willing to accept an amendment to permit the owner of a mixed-breed animal to have one litter per year" Here is the link to the entire article... http://www.sacbee.com/111/story/209429.html More quotes from a different article… again Huh???? and I love the part about "unspecified amount" to purchase a "breeding permit" which is in the first noted article "Levine promised to amend the bill in the state Senate to allow any dog or cat owner to buy a permit that would allow the animal to remain unfixed and have one litter a year. The permit would have to be renewed annually. Levine also said he would modify the bill's language to ensure that a pet owner cited for failure to have an animal spayed or neutered would not have to pay the $500 fine if he or she agreed to have the animal fixed." Also of note was that the vote was held up by aboutn 10 hours to convience two reps that AKC has now "agreed" with this law... which if you go to the AKC site is totally incorrect...
  • California Dog Friendly Hotels

    Basenji Talk
    5
    0 Votes
    5 Posts
    2k Views
    basenjibratzB
    Cambria is located on the coast of California. It is north of Los Angeles and South of San Jose. Cities along the coast seem to be much more dog friendly. It's beautiful along the coast. Santa Barbara, Monterey, Carmel and Cambria are very dog friendly places to visit and very beautiful.
  • AB1634 California

    Basenji Talk
    7
    0 Votes
    7 Posts
    3k Views
    lvossL
    Also, if anyone can set up a face to face with their representative in addition to writing a letter that would be huge. If you go to the AKC website you can find information on talking points and finding your representative.
  • Dog friendly areas in Northern California?

    Basenji Talk
    2
    0 Votes
    2 Posts
    1k Views
    VanessaV
    @Tayda_Lenny: Hello! there is a possibility that Tayda, Lenny and I will be moving Northern California in the next few months! I noticed there are a lot of Northern Californians on the forum and I'm wondering where the really dog friendly area are. I might be working in San Jose, and would prefer to live about 1/2 hour north - maybe in Freemont/Union City/Newark area. Is this area dog friendly? Are there fenced in Dog Parks around? Hello there! I live in Cupertino and work in San Jose. Here are two websites that will tell you what dog parks, trails and even hotels you can take your B to. http://www.bahiker.com/doghikes.html http://www.wagntrain.com/dog_parks.htm