@nobarkus:
Kathy's suggestion about the climate may have validity as it seems to have have shown up more now that it's colder.
He still has his dew claws so I don't know if any breeders leave those on do they?
The climate is beyoind a valid point.
I know breeders [and I will use this term loosely, because they do breed, but I consider them a puppy mill] that keep their "dog room" at 80* all year round. Before they started doing this… their dogs came from lines that were notorious for rough, prickly, tan [meaning super light red] coats with distinct guardhairs. They began doing this and during the winter, their dogs would not "blow coat" as those that spend a great deal of time outdoors. This is because the body has no reason to gain that undercoat because the dog is so warm all year long.
If they were in and out of the house… and the house being a normal 72* and winter weather in Oregon [anywhere from 20s to 50s] the dogs would get a dense undercoat.
Since these dogs virtually live in the "dog room" except for potty breaks, they body doesn't turn on the "we need to grow a thick coat to keep warm" and they keep the shorter, more correct coats.
I think everyone was looking at different pictures than I did. I never saw any skin on the dog… just tan undercoat throghout the flanks and rear legs.
Yes, pumpkin is said to help the dogs coat, as well as firm up stools. It also helps the orangey-red in the chestnut color become a brighter orange.
About the dewclaws... it is customary (basically being the norm in the basenji breed) in the US to remove them. I recently saw pictures of a gal that had her first litter in Cali and she left them on. When I asked her about it, she told me "well, they were born with them."
I, personally, do not like to see them and have seen them tear [not on a basenji] on the lure field. So removing them is two-fold for me.
I did check with Pam and she said that Oregon does not have a red hue at all. So, not sure what you were seeing, just bad lighting I'd guesstimate.